PACT RECRUITMENT GROUP
HomeAboutOur ExpertiseInsightsPACT ReserveJobsContact Us
Start the Conversation
Insights / Talent operations
← Back to all insights
Talent operations · 5 min read · Jul 2026

This Month's Insight: Do You Know What Talent Actually Costs Your Business?

Everyone tracks cost per hire. Almost nobody tracks the four numbers that tell you whether the hire actually worked.

Kim Snodgrass
PACT Recruitment Group
Share LinkedIn
Rising bar chart with blue trend arrow
The four numbers
Cost is only one of them
01 Cost of vacancy Who is covering the seat, and at what capacity?
02 Quality of hire Twelve months on, did the hire perform?
03 Talent engagement Is the pipeline working, or quietly leaking?
04 Offer acceptance Read against the cover, not just the market.
26% of HR budget spent on recruiting
20% measure whether it worked
Source · SHRM 2025 benchmarking reports
Contents
1. Cost of vacancy 2. Quality of hire 3. Talent engagement 4. Offer acceptance The takeaway

1. Cost of vacancy — the cover, not just the seat

Most formulas assume a vacant role produces nothing. In practice, someone almost always stretches to cover it, at partial capacity, with no scope communicated to the wider team. A role worth 25% of a team's output, covered at half capacity, isn't costing 25%. It's costing the uncovered half — 12.5%, every day.

"The vacancy is the visible cost. The unclear, uncommunicated cover is the one that compounds."

2. Quality of hire — did they actually perform?

Time to fill tells you when the requisition closed. It doesn't tell you whether the hire worked. SHRM's 2025 benchmarking found organizations spent 26% of HR budget on recruiting, yet only 20% measured quality of hire.

The data usually already exists — performance reviews, retention, promotion history — it's just never connected back to the hiring decision.

3. Talent engagement — is the pipeline working, or quietly leaking?

Response rates, time-to-first-contact, and how candidates describe the process all signal whether talent is engaging with you or dropping out before an offer's ever made. A weak pipeline is rarely a market problem. It's usually a process one.

4. Offer acceptance — read against the cover, not just the market

A below-benchmark acceptance rate is usually blamed on compensation. Read alongside the cost of vacancy, it often points somewhere else: roles that were poorly covered or rushed to fill send a signal candidates pick up on during the process, before an offer is even made.

The takeaway

None of these four require new systems. They require someone to ask the question and write down the answer. Most leadership teams can answer zero of the four for their current open roles.

Want this run on your numbers?

We'll tell you which of the four you can already answer, and what the gaps are costing.

Start the Conversation →

This insight references 2025 SHRM benchmarking research and established cost-of-vacancy methodology.

Sources

SHRM. "SHRM Releases 2025 Benchmarking Reports: How Does Your Organization Compare?" October 15, 2025.

Keep reading
JUN 2026 · OPERATIONS
When a talent problem is not a talent problem
SEP 2026 · LEADERSHIP MARKET
Target is building its own beauty destination
SEP 2026 · WORKFORCE DATA
When labor costs outrun the bid
← Back to all insights
PACT Recruitment Group · Houston, Texas
Privacy policyTermsCookie and email preferences
© 2026